Prices whatever gets typed in
- Asks for material, overall size and a hole count
- Expects the customer to read a technical drawing
- Knows nothing about threads, pockets or radii
- Cannot tell whether the part fits your machine
Category guide
How the price is built, what to demand from a system that builds it for you, and when that system should back off and hand the part to a human.
Definition
The term gets stretched. It comes down to one question: who measures the part - the system or the customer.
A calculator that asks for material, overall size and a hole count, then multiplies that by a rate, also gets called instant quoting - except its answer is only as good as the numbers typed in by someone who may not be able to read them off a drawing.
A quote earns the name only when the system reads the geometry from the file itself: dimensions, holes, pockets, threads, internal radii and machining directions. Then the customer does not need to understand manufacturing, and the shop is not exposed to somebody entering the wrong size.
Starting point
This cost never appears on an invoice, which is why shops rarely count it. It has four parts.
Hours from the person who should be programming and planning production, spent answering enquiries.
The enquiry sits in the inbox until somebody has a moment to open it.
A customer who did not hear back the same day was usually asking elsewhere too.
The same part quoted on Monday and on Friday can differ by tens of percent.
The largest of these costs is usually not the time, it is the lost enquiries. A customer who never got an answer shows up in no report at all - because they never became an order.
How it works
Nine things happen between an uploaded file and a displayed price. Each one is a place where a system can cut corners.
The system opens the STEP or IGES file and repairs the small defects left behind by the CAD export.
Bounding box, volume, surface area, and from the material density - mass.
Holes with their depth, pockets with an access direction, threads, the smallest internal radius and wall thickness.
Whether the part is rotational, how many machining directions it needs, whether any of them are angled and call for a fixture.
The travels of the shop's machines and its smallest available tool against the radii in the model.
Cutting from the volume to remove, drilling and tapping per feature, finishing according to surface type.
Setup, programming, first-article inspection and stock purchase - charged per batch, then divided across the pieces.
Tolerances, fits and surface finish, secondary operations, margin and shipping.
Whether the price may go out automatically, or the part should go to a human.
Checklist
Ten questions that separate a system which genuinely calculates from a calculator with a nice interface.
Work through it with every vendor you are considering - including us.
Does it read the geometry from the file, or does somebody have to type the dimensions in?
Does it treat holes and threads separately? Tapping takes a completely different time from drilling.
Does it charge setup, programming and first-article inspection per batch, or add them to every piece? That decides whether prices at larger quantities make any sense.
Does it assess manufacturability - machine travels and the smallest tool radius?
Does it tell milling from turning and pick the machine to suit the shape?
Does it break an assembly into separate line items, or must each part be uploaded on its own?
Does it price with your rates, or with averaged market ones?
Can the engine be calibrated on your historical prices?
Does it charge for tighter tolerances and better surface finish - that is, for what actually takes time on the machine?
Does it explain where the price came from, or return a single number with no reasoning?
Limits
This is the question software vendors dislike, and it decides whether a system is fit for production.
A system that always returns a price will eventually return a wrong one, and nobody notices until the part reaches the machine. A well-designed system stops where its confidence is low.
It exceeds the working envelope, or the model needs a tool smaller than anything in the shop.
Complexity passes the threshold beyond which a time estimate stops being trustworthy.
The quote passes the amount above which the shop wants to look at it personally.
Either one can wreck the machining time, because both force cautious cutting parameters.
The file looks like something you buy rather than machine - a bearing, a screw, a retaining ring.
The geometry was reconstructed from 2D views rather than read from a 3D model.
When you ask a vendor about the limits of their system, notice whether they can list any. „Our engine quotes everything” says more about the salesperson than about the product.
Who it suits
Automated quoting is not universal. Here are both sides of the same calculation.
Rollout
Whichever system you pick, the order is the same. The third step is the one most often skipped, and skipping it costs the most.
Machines with their travels, available tooling, material grades and their prices.
A machine-hour rate per machine, setup and programming costs, margin.
A handful of parts you have already quoted. The most skipped step and the most expensive to skip.
With every quote held for approval at first. Automation once you trust the numbers.
A calculator asks you to enter material, overall size and a hole count, so its answer is only as good as the numbers entered by someone who may not be able to read them off a drawing. Instant quoting reads the geometry straight from the file, so the customer does not need to understand manufacturing.
It depends on two things: whether the system measures the part itself, and whether it prices with that shop's rates. An engine calibrated on one shop's historical prices lands far closer than a generic calculator. A well-designed system also flags the cases where its own confidence is low.
A drawing yields the material, threads, tolerances and surface finish, and for flat parts the solid can be reconstructed too. Rebuilding turned and prismatic parts from views alone is far harder, so in practice those drawings go to manual quoting - with the difference that the engineer receives a filled-in form rather than an empty one.
It does not replace their judgement, only the repetitive work. Routine quotes go out automatically while the engineer handles what actually needs a decision. A sensibly configured system runs on automation plus approval: a price goes out on its own only where the shop allowed it.
The configuration itself - machines, materials, rates - is usually a few hours. The critical step is the one most often skipped: calibration against parts the shop has already quoted. That is what decides whether the first automatic prices are acceptable.
Ones where every job is negotiated individually, needs a conversation about manufacturing and ends in a meeting anyway. There, automation at best prepares a starting point for that conversation rather than replacing it.
Geometry read from the file, costing with the shop's own rates, calibration on historical prices, and safety gates that hand an unusual part to a human. The configurator embeds on your site with one line of code.